http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/ TCP Implementation Fri, 06 Jul 2001 20:09:56 GMT Matt Mathis http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2632 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2632 ... I beleive all implementation are careful to do the rounding such that they never announce space beyond the end of the buffer. Im my example the last Fri, 06 Jul 2001 12:09:31 GMT David C. Dickson http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2631 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2631 To: TCP-IMPL@... NEW SPEAKERS ADDED PLEASE FORWARD THIS TO YOUR MANAGER OF SYSTEMS SECURITY AND SECURITY TECHNOLOGIES GROUP. Market*Access Thu, 05 Jul 2001 23:18:59 GMT Charles Esson http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2630 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2630 I've not implemented a TCP stack that uses the scale option ( performance over satellite links is not my problem), so I had not thought about this. I have now, Thu, 05 Jul 2001 21:08:15 GMT Matt Mathis http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2629 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2629 I think we have conflicting standards.... although I agree with your recollection, I believe that strict "never retract the window" can not be implemented. Sun, 01 Jul 2001 15:52:26 GMT SoftCOM http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2628 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2628 SoftCOM 2001 9th IEEE Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks Split, Dubrovnik (Croatia), Ancona, Bari (Italy) October 09-12, 2001 Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:59:56 GMT simoni http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2627 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2627 Cher(es) collègue(s), Nous lançons le 4ème colloque GRES'2001 sur le thème : "De la maîtrise de la QoS au SLA dynamique à l'heure du tout IP" Nous sommes Fri, 22 Jun 2001 04:52:09 GMT Jae Choon Park http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2626 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2626 SECOND CALL FOR PAPER CIC 2001 The 6th CDMA International Conference Oct. 30 - Nov. 2, 2001, Sheraton Walker Hill Hotel & Towers, Seoul, Korea Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:05:30 GMT Saad Biaz http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2625 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2625 ANNOUNCEMENT AND CALL FOR PAPERS Please Accept Our Sincere Apologies Should you Receive Multiple Copies of this CFP The Society for Computer Simulation Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:30:59 GMT Charles Esson http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2624 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2624 1) Somewhere in the mile high stack of paper that represents the TCP standard it says that the receiver is not allowed to reduce it's advertised window. 2) Tue, 19 Jun 2001 05:38:33 GMT Martin McSweeney http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2623 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2623 Hello, my question regards the persist mode feature of TCP. In general, sending a zero window acknowledgement forces a sender into persist mode, and a Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:24:23 GMT Andreas Pitsillides http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2622 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2622 ... (ariel@...) Fri, 01 Jun 2001 13:07:55 GMT SoftCOM http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2621 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2621 CALL FOR PAPERS SoftCOM 2001 IEEE International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks Workshop on Future Wireless Communications Thu, 31 May 2001 00:08:56 GMT David S. Miller http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2620 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2620 ... Indeed, my mistake. Later, David S. Miller davem@... Wed, 30 May 2001 23:37:59 GMT Bob Braden http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2619 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2619 *> *> I don't see how it could be illegal, if the ACK flag bit is clear this *> simply means to ignore the ACK field. No, it means ignore the packet (unless Wed, 30 May 2001 22:38:32 GMT Abolade Gbadegesin http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2618 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcp-impl/message/2618 RFC 793, section 3.7, paragraph 3: "... Note that once in the ESTABLISHED state all segments must carry current acknowledgment information." ibid., section