<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>tdom at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/</link>
    <description>tDOM - fast DOM / XPath for Tcl in C</description>

    <item>
      <title>Is XML Scheme validation planned in the near future?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:45:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Martin Lemburg</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1989</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1989</guid>
      <description>Hello, currently tdom &quot;only&quot; supports DTD validation ... is there a chance to get support for the XML scheme validation in tdom in the near future? I ask,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: tdom for 64 bit windows</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:23:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rolf Ade</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1987</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1987</guid>
      <description>... Not that I&#39;m aware of one public available. AFICT ActiveState doesn&#39;t have a (at least free) 64bit distribution of their ActiveTcl (though they have a free</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>64 bit version of tdom</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:45:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Larry W. Virden</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1986</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1986</guid>
      <description>It would seem to me that if you built the tcl as 64 bit, then you should be able to build the tdom as 64 bit. If you downloaded the tcl as 64 bit, then check</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>tdom for 64 bit windows</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:30:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Raghav Kashi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1985</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1985</guid>
      <description>Hi, Is there a 64bit version of the tdom library available for windows? Please direct me to the libraries if anyone knows this. ... Thanks Raghav</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: tcl shell &quot;vanishes&quot;, with &quot;$docNode asXML&quot; on a former parsed H</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:46:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Martin Lemburg</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1981</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1981</guid>
      <description>Hello Rolf, your are so right! First - I didn&#39;t attache the html file and didn&#39;t try to get the stderr output, which is: tcldom_AppendEscaped: can only handle</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: tcl shell &quot;vanishes&quot;, with &quot;$docNode asXML&quot; on a former parsed H</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:06:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rolf Ade</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1980</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1980</guid>
      <description>... Attaching the rponline.de.xml (or puting it somewhere on the net, public accessible) would at least get a chance to actually look at the case. So, all I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>tcl shell &quot;vanishes&quot;, with &quot;$docNode asXML&quot; on a former parsed HTML </title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:15:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>martinlemburg</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1979</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1979</guid>
      <description>Hello, is there a chance to find out, why the tcl shell using tDOM crashes without any &quot;comment&quot; using the simple &quot;$docNode asXML&quot; command? I&#39;ve done the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HI TCL EXPERTS</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:57:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>nilesh sahu</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1976</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1976</guid>
      <description>Hi Kannan,   You can use tdom package of Tcl.   Thanks, Nilesh ... From: kannansut &lt;kannanjmc@...&gt; Subject: [tdom] HI TCL EXPERTS To:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>HI TCL EXPERTS</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:11:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kannansut</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1975</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1975</guid>
      <description>Hi TCL, I have a requirement to read a xml in TCL. I do not how to proceed with and which package to use. Please help ! Thanks in Advance, N.Kannan</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XSLT with tDOM</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:55:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rebosher</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1971</guid>
      <description>Has the planned tutorial ever materialized: how to use tDOM&#39;s XSLT engine (http://wiki.tcl.tk/1948) Can someone outline their experience with tDOM as an</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Parsing HTML doesn&#39;t autoclose all &lt;li&gt; tags</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:23:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>scheltebron</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1970</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1970</guid>
      <description>... Similar code is needed for &lt;dd&gt; and &lt;dt&gt;. So this is my suggested patch (combined with the &lt;li&gt; change as that does not yet seem to be in CVS): Index:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Parsing HTML doesn&#39;t autoclose all &lt;li&gt; tags</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:59:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rolf Ade</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1969</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1969</guid>
      <description>... Yes. ... Well, yes, autoclosing is a weak point of the html parser. Thanks for your patch. rolf</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Parsing HTML doesn&#39;t autoclose all &lt;li&gt; tags</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:34:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Schelte Bron</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1968</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1968</guid>
      <description>Hi, Is this the right place to send small patches? I found out that autoclosing of HTML &lt;li&gt; tags doesn&#39;t yet fully work in the current CVS head. I figured out</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: debian modifications to tdom</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:48:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Larry W. Virden</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1964</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1964</guid>
      <description>... http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=344122 is the report I saw today that brought it to mind. However, I&#39;ve not taken a look through their</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: debian modifications to tdom</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:54:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rolf Ade</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1963</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tdom/message/1963</guid>
      <description>... No, I didn&#39;t know about that things. Is that discussion archived public available, somewhere and do you have a link to it? rolf</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Mar 28 16:58:09 PDT 2010 -->
