<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>tetrahedronT3 at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/</link>
    <description>Alternative Periodic Tables</description>

    <item>
      <title>tetrahedrons have interesting application</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:22:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/283</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/283</guid>
      <description>Hi Jess- Tetrahedrons do have interesting applications. The geometry of space-time (Schwarzschild metric) may be represented as a tetrahedron. Please see my</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: fundamental properties of matter</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 05:19:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JessT</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/282</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/282</guid>
      <description>Hoping for a speedy healthy outcome. I&#39;ve had some neurological issues myself, mostly having to do with hearing and vision, but nothing permanent so far.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fundamental properties of matter</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 05:14:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/281</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/281</guid>
      <description>Hi Jess Sorry I have not joined you for a while. I had a stroke a few months ago, however I am recovering now. The following is a little off topic however I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bottom of Pacific Ocean has billions of tons of rare earth metal</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 09:09:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Melinda Green</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/280</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/280</guid>
      <description>Wow, that&#39;s quite a news story! It&#39;s amazing to me that just about everything about it is positive. Not so much for poor China though as you point out. It also</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bottom of Pacific Ocean has billions of tons of rare earth metals</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 06:07:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JessT</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/279</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/279</guid>
      <description>http://news.yahoo.com/huge-rare-earth-deposits-found-pacific-report-000045557.html Guess China ain&#39;t gonna corner the market after all... Jess Tauber </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do traditional period endings have something to do with circles and </title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 23:00:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JessT</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/278</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/278</guid>
      <description>I was just looking over Eric Scerri&#39;s piece &#39;How good is the quantum mechanical explanation for the periodic system&#39; </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fine Structure Constant and polygons</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 22:02:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JessT</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/277</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/277</guid>
      <description>Ok, been working on more atomic relations. On the Wiki page for the Fine Structure Constant ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine_structure_constant ) one finds</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Update on ADOMAH Periodic table</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:04:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>V.&quot;Larry&quot; Tsimmerman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/276</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/276</guid>
      <description>I have a good news to report regarding ADOMAH Periodic Table. 35,000 copies in English and French. Please, see email below from publisher. Best Regards, Valery</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Double (Triangular) Trouble</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:07:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JessT</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/275</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/275</guid>
      <description>Rationalization of double triangular number differences between idealized orbital filling benchmark numbers: Level 0 [__0 diff.2 Level 1 [__2___0 diff 6 Level</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>simplified EFE</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 19:01:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/274</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/274</guid>
      <description>Hi Jess. I am a little off topic again. The Einstein Field Equation (EFE) may be simplified.  A tensor may be substituted by a ratio of stress and a scalar may</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Triangular numbers and the nucleus</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:54:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jess tauber</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/273</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/273</guid>
      <description>This is the Leftmost-Leftmost system, which is that of most of the magic numbers that we usually think of in the nuclear system: 258- 184= 74= 72&#43;2 184- 126=</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Triangular numbers and the nucleus</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:56:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JessT</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/272</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/272</guid>
      <description>The nuclear shell filling pattern can be idealized as blocks somewhat analogous to what is seen in the electronic system, but organized differently. Thus</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Special Velocities</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:02:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JessT</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/271</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/271</guid>
      <description>Who can say what is still yet to be discovered? The other day people announced a more precise value for the Hubble expansion of the universe- 73.8 (&#43;/-2.4)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Special Velocities</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:54:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/270</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/270</guid>
      <description>Hi Jess The following is a little off topic however I hope it is of interest to the group. The speed of light in a vacuum (c) is unique, it is assumed to be</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The latest buzz- now, a periodic table for flies, no less</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:04:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Valery</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/269</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tetrahedronT3/message/269</guid>
      <description>Classification of minerals, plants and animals predates the classification of the chemical elements by 100 years or so. Idea of classification of chemical</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- rss1.grp.bf1.yahoo.com uncompressed Thu May 23 07:03:56 PDT 2013 -->
