<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>textualcriticism at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/</link>
    <description>Textual Criticism of the Bible</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Lk 11:34 what is this in P75?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:32:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Wieland Willker</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3973</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3973</guid>
      <description>... Interesting suggestion. Perhaps there is some edge on the papyrus? The only idea I&#39;ve had is that perhaps the slash after the &quot;Phi&quot; is a sign for an</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Byzantine vs Alexandrian readings, side by side</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:22:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Wieland Willker</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3972</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3972</guid>
      <description>... I think it is: O EIPON corrected into ON EIPON (the N above is still visible and not deleted) Then the O EIPON has been deleted and the words have been</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Byzantine vs Alexandrian readings, side by side</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:08:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James Snapp, Jr.</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3971</guid>
      <description>Daniel Buck, In that part of my response, I didn&#39;t mean that a person could discern that a MS was Byz by spot-checking any one of the passages in Terry&#39;s list;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lk 11:34 what is this in P75?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:07:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Hindley</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3970</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3970</guid>
      <description>W, Another possibility ... If you rotate the zoomed-in (your &quot;cropped&quot;) picture until it is upside down, and play with it by flipping it horizontally back and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Byzantine vs Alexandrian readings, side by side</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:10:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Daniel Buck</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3969</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3969</guid>
      <description>... Alexandrian?&lt; ... through the trouble of making a full collation, a pretty good idea of the textual character of the MS could probably be made by spot- </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lk 11:34 what is this in P75?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:36:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Hindley</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3968</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3968</guid>
      <description>Wieland, Looks a bit like Hebrew or Aramaic in box script. Respectfully, Dave Hindley Newton Falls, Ohio USA ... From:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lk 11:34 what is this in P75?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 08:21:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Wieland Willker</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3967</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3967</guid>
      <description>A question to the experts: In P75 there is an addition above the line, which I cannot make out. What is it? Is it Greek? Have a look here: </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Byzantine vs Alexandrian readings, side by side</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:07:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James Snapp, Jr.</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3966</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3966</guid>
      <description>Dear Eddie: If you had a MS of the Gospels and wanted to know which text-type it aligned with, one way would be to carefully collate the entire MS and then see</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to determine if a specific text is Byz or Alex or West or Ot</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:45:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Wieland Willker</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3965</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3965</guid>
      <description>... I would take a pragmatic approach: A Byzantine reading is a reading of which the majority support is Byzantine. Normally a Byzantine reading is also the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to determine if a specific text is Byz or Alex or West or Other</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:18:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Eddie Mishoe</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3964</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3964</guid>
      <description>What makes a Byzantine reading Byzantine? And what makes an Alexandrian reading Alexandrian? The reason I ask is because you can find (so I&#39;m told) a Byzantine</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Review of Parker&#39;s New Testament Manuscripts and Texts</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:11:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Wieland Willker</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3963</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3963</guid>
      <description>... Yes, that&#39;s interesting. I will try to get this article. ... This is the case in reality, yes. ... Advancement of faith by variants? I don&#39;t know. I need</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Review of Parker&#39;s New Testament Manuscripts and Texts</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:11:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Wieland Willker</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3962</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3962</guid>
      <description>... Well, strictly we cannot, of course. But I haven&#39;t seen any convincing demonstration that they are not by the same author. But this isn&#39;t my main point</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Byzantine vs Alexandrian readings, side by side</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:22:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>yennifmit</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3961</guid>
      <description>Dear James, I get the figure like this. Consider, say, the population of Greek manuscripts of the Pauline corpus (as single copies) at the year 300 AD. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Review of Parker&#39;s New Testament Manuscripts and Texts</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:35:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Hindley</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3960</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3960</guid>
      <description>Hi Wieland, &lt;&lt;p. 286: &quot;Acts is unique&quot;: One important aspect not mentioned in this chapter is that Acts and the Gospel of Luke are by one author and are often</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Review of Parker&#39;s New Testament Manuscripts and Texts</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:40:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tommy Wasserman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3959</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/textualcriticism/message/3959</guid>
      <description>Wieland, incidentally, one of the articles, namely &quot;In Pursuit of a Singular Text: New Testament Textual Criticism and the Desire for the True Original </description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.scd.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Sep  7 18:23:04 PDT 2008 -->
