textualcriticism at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Manuscript Sinaiticus vs. Vaticanus

Vox Verax — Sat, 18 May 2013 09:20:34 GMT

George Eller, Not to draw attention away from the main question here, but ... GE: "The Bishop of Alexandria complained (?) that Eusebius ordered him to

Re: p112 (was: Manuscript Sinaiticus vs. Vaticanus)

Daniel Buck — Sat, 18 May 2013 09:20:27 GMT

From:yennifmit Hi George, A little while ago I wrote something that mentions the "girls who were skilled in elegant writing" employed by

Armenian MSS-Images at HMML

Vox Verax — Fri, 17 May 2013 17:02:29 GMT

More and more Armenian manuscripts are coming online. The Hill Museum & Manuscript Library has images of several collections of (mainly) Armenian materials,

Re: Manuscript Sinaiticus vs. Vaticanus

Steven Avery — Fri, 17 May 2013 06:52:56 GMT

Hi, On the Eusebius question, we should note the fascinating section ... The Revised Version of the first three Gospels considered in its bearings upon the

Vaticanus and Sinaiticus: A Common Origin

Vox Verax — Fri, 17 May 2013 06:11:53 GMT

Mike Karoules, I hope you're hungry. As we approach the question of whether or not Sinaiticus and Vaticanus share a copyist, another question should be asked

Re: Manuscript Sinaiticus vs. Vaticanus

yennifmit — Fri, 17 May 2013 06:11:42 GMT

Hi George, A little while ago I wrote something that mentions the "girls who were skilled in elegant writing" employed by Origen:

Re: Manuscript Sinaiticus vs. Vaticanus

clearbrush — Fri, 17 May 2013 06:11:33 GMT

Hi Mike again, The information that I passed on to you is "non-blatant"; i.e., it is not conspicuous in the ancient records. If it was, it would be common

Re: Manuscript Sinaiticus vs. Vaticanus

tom630965 — Fri, 17 May 2013 06:11:19 GMT

Mike Vaticanus is not a 'late discovery'; it has been in the Vatican library since the 15th century, and was known, by reputation, to Erasmus. In 1533 the

Re: Manuscript Sinaiticus vs. Vaticanus

mike karoules — Thu, 16 May 2013 06:02:21 GMT

George, If Eusebius is the architect behind these 2 manuscripts then we should be able to compare and see the similarities of text types between MS Sinaiticus/

Re: Manuscript Sinaiticus vs. Vaticanus

mike karoules — Thu, 16 May 2013 06:02:08 GMT

James, Thank you so much. Yes, the more information on this for me- the better. So, please realize when you bring this issue up again (on Sinaiticus vs

Re: Manuscript Sinaiticus vs. Vaticanus

clearbrush — Wed, 15 May 2013 19:56:30 GMT

Hi Mike, The general question of the relationship between Vaticanus, Sanaitus and other ancient mss often arises, because that relationship has not been

Re: Manuscript Sinaiticus vs. Vaticanus

Vox Verax — Wed, 15 May 2013 13:45:37 GMT

Mike K, This brief reply won't be as lengthy as I wish, but please stay tuned for more on this subject when the opportunity arises. Mike K: "I have read from

Re: Manuscript Sinaiticus vs. Vaticanus

yennifmit — Wed, 15 May 2013 05:57:19 GMT

Hi Mike, Milne and Skeat (_Scribes and Correctors of the Codex Sinaiticus_, London: British Museum, 1938_) suggested a common scribal tradition for Sinaiticus

Re: Help with some more Latin, please

Dr. Don Wilkins — Wed, 15 May 2013 05:57:08 GMT

The Latin verb in question (praefor) is deponent, so "praefatus est" seems to require "he said previously" or something similar. The participle by itself can

Re: Manuscript Sinaiticus vs. Vaticanus

sarban — Tue, 14 May 2013 19:58:02 GMT

... From: "Robert Relyea" To: Cc: "mikek" Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 7:15 PM