<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>the_gdf at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/</link>
    <description>The Gnutella Developer Forum (GDF)</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Updated PFSP specifications</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:07:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Arne Babenhauserheide</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23591</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23591</guid>
      <description>... I just read from Gregor that he adapted Phex, so your extension doesn&#39;t create problems for our download code anymore. Sorry for the noise, and thank you</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ultrapeer Status &quot;UP&quot; GGEP question</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:37:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Raphael_Manfredi@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23590</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23590</guid>
      <description>... Yes, the reason is that gtk-gnutella follows the published specifications! The following page: </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ultrapeer Status &quot;UP&quot; GGEP question</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:38:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>pitermagram</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23589</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23589</guid>
      <description>Hi, i have the following question about &quot;UP&quot; ggep: in LimeWire client sources when this ggep parsed/created first comes ultrapeer version, then amount of free</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Updated PFSP specifications</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 07:29:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Raphael_Manfredi@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23588</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23588</guid>
      <description>... It&#39;s useful to know how much of a file each client has, even if the list of available ranges is incomplete, and the burden of the extra header is small </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Updated PFSP specifications</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:06:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Justin Chapweske</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23587</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23587</guid>
      <description>I doubt you really need to put something like this explicitly in a spec.  If a client choose to advertise less available ranges to a certain requester, then</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Updated PFSP specifications</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 23:26:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Arne Babenhauserheide</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23586</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23586</guid>
      <description>... Ouch... would the fragmentation reduction help which Phex uses? One simple way (I don&#39;t know if it&#39;s the one Phex uses): Just do Worst Fit (choose a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Updated PFSP specifications</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:22:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Raphael_Manfredi@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23585</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23585</guid>
      <description>... If I did, I&#39;d ban 95% of the clients, roughly speaking, 4 main vendors (not counting the derivatives based on the same code but branded as another vendor).</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Updated PFSP specifications</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Arne Babenhauserheide</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23584</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23584</guid>
      <description>... Wouldn&#39;t it be better to simply ban these clients, then? Best wishes, Arne -- -- Ein Würfel System: http://1w6.org - einfach saubere (Rollenspiel-)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Updated PFSP specifications</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:22:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Raphael_Manfredi@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23583</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23583</guid>
      <description>... The sole motivation of this change is simply to save bandwidth when &quot;bad&quot; clients request a highly fragmented file without honouring the Retry-After </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Updated PFSP specifications</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:39:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Arne Babenhauserheide</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23582</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23582</guid>
      <description>Hi Raphael, Many thanks for updating the spec! The texts overally looks good, but the extension is problematic for Phex: Phex uses the X-Available-Ranges to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Updated PFSP specifications</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:10:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Raphael Manfredi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23581</guid>
      <description>I have updated the PFSP specs, cleaning up the format, fixing errors. I have also added a new feature, described in section 5, that will be implemented in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Creating a Query for a SHA-1 Hash</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 07:11:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Arne Babenhauserheide</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23580</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23580</guid>
      <description>... That sounds like just add support for broadcast style hash queries again, or do I misunderstand you? Wishes, Arne -- -- My stuff: http://draketo.de -</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Creating a Query for a SHA-1 Hash</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:49:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Aaron Walkhouse</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23579</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23579</guid>
      <description>... full search ... much that ... A old-fashioned hash search comes in from wherever, leaf or peer, it either matches a hash or not in your table and you send</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>need help from a beginner</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:25:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>djianbin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23578</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23578</guid>
      <description>Hi, I am new to Gnutella. Can anyone help me on how to start with GGEP programming? like website, documents I can start with? Thank you very much. JB</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Creating a Query for a SHA-1 Hash</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:37:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Angel Leon</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23577</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/23577</guid>
      <description>&quot;=&gt; Most people don&#39;t use hashes regularly.&quot; Chicken and egg problem. If hash searches aren&#39;t supported how the hell are people going to use them. People use</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Jul  4 19:16:03 PDT 2009 -->
