tmcl-wg at Yahoo! Groups

Yahoo Groups Mail List Migration

mnishikawa@... — Fri, 21 Feb 2003 09:12:29 GMT

Hi TMCL-WG Subscribers, The Yahoo TMCL-WG mail list is being moved to isotopicmaps.org. You will be receiving an invitation to join the list there soon. You

Re: Functional Requirements and Syntax Proposals: Please Submit

Dmitry — Fri, 21 Feb 2003 04:18:57 GMT

[Mary Nishikawa] ... I would like to provide some comments about item 3.3: "Classes (object-oriented) or Syntax Examples illustrating usage Scenarios in

FR SP No. 1 (example created by MN)

Mary Nishikawa — Sun, 16 Feb 2003 10:51:20 GMT

Here is an example. Please comment on structure and content. Thanks. -- Mary 3.2 Functional Requirements Functional Requirement SP No. 1: Define Topics Used as

Functional Requirements and Syntax Proposals: Please Submit

Mary Nishikawa — Sun, 16 Feb 2003 10:51:20 GMT

Hi, We got through reviewing section 1 of N 226. Thank you for your help. I was able to begin a first draft with your comments. I would like to continue

Vote summary on tm?l-wg list move

Lars Marius Garshol — Sat, 15 Feb 2003 12:12:26 GMT

I've now, finally, gone through the votes and the result is: isotopicmaps 9 XMLhack 7 So there is a majority for isotopicmaps, if not exactly

Fwd: Re: [sc34wg3] TMCL-WG Summary of Contributions

Mary Nishikawa — Tue, 11 Feb 2003 14:09:45 GMT

Martin, Your comments are very much appreciated. They are on the mark and I will change the draft accordingly. Cheers, Mary

Re: implicit subclass relation in TMCL?

Dmitry — Tue, 11 Feb 2003 03:36:41 GMT

[Robert Barta] ... developer ... Robert, I would like to reformulate problem a little bit. I hope it will help discussion. If we have statement (constraint)

Re: TMCL-WG Summary of Contributions

Mary Nishikawa — Mon, 10 Feb 2003 02:29:45 GMT

... Thanks for your prompt feedback! I wanted to start with this preliminary framework and develop it from there. ... Agreed. ... This is a stylistic matter

Re: TMCL-WG Summary of Contributions

Lars Marius Garshol — Sun, 09 Feb 2003 23:02:12 GMT

* Lars Marius Garshol ... I forgot to say that our test suite for our OSL implementation is structured this way, except that it does not distinguish between c)

Re: TMCL-WG Summary of Contributions

Lars Marius Garshol — Sun, 09 Feb 2003 22:53:18 GMT

* Mary Nishikawa ... Great work, Mary! This is an excellent beginning. Suddenly we are a lot closer to having a real requirements document. ... Another purpose

implicit subclass relation in TMCL?

Robert Barta — Sun, 09 Feb 2003 03:22:36 GMT

Hi, Here is one detail where I am not able to get my mind around: Whenever I do some constraining then some/most constraints will look like this: "if this is a

TMCL-WG Summary of Contributions

Mary Nishikawa — Sun, 09 Feb 2003 01:58:59 GMT

Hi, Thank you very much in providing initial feedback on the TMCL. I am very encouraged to work with such an enthusiastic and knowledgeable group of people.

Re: TMCL User Requirement #1: Please Comment

Robert Barta — Fri, 07 Feb 2003 21:32:35 GMT

... No, that would not be good. The translation should happen behind the ... # here I am in a file with complex and simpler constraints # complex constraint 1:

Re: TMCL User Requirement #1: Please Comment

Anthony B. Coates — Fri, 07 Feb 2003 17:14:51 GMT

** Reply to message from Robert Barta on Fri, 7 Feb 2003 06:57:15 +1000 ... [ ... snip ... ] ... Actually, I would advise against one-way

Re: TM?L mail lists move

Rath, Holger (empolis KL) — Fri, 07 Feb 2003 11:16:02 GMT

Thomas, But this is true for RDF as well (RDF is a concept and XML is only *one* possibel interchange syntax) and RDF is listed at XMLhack. --Holger -- Dr. H.