<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>tuning-math at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/</link>
    <description>tuning-math</description>

    <item>
      <title>Here is a temperament; I haven&#39;t mastered the notation; how should i</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:57:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>tomhchappell</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17519</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17519</guid>
      <description>Here is an even temperament, fairly close to just. I haven&#39;t mastered the notation; how should this temperament be denoted? 2^840 is about 13^227. 7^153 is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: even better than 17-WT?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:16:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gdsecor</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17518</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17518</guid>
      <description>... Aha!  This message was posted nearly 2 months ago and just showed up today! &quot;Manu&quot; &amp; I have been discussing this off-list, and I&#39;m now in the process of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: sorry for the delayed messages!</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:30:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Carl Lumma</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17517</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17517</guid>
      <description>... And I&#39;m still waking up.  Sorry I approved that intelligent design thing.  -Carl</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Diaschismic and Kleismic family data</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:25:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Carl Lumma</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17516</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17516</guid>
      <description>Hi aerisselicious, Was your message below truncated?  It&#39;s missing an endquote apparently.  Also, who are you? -Carl</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>sorry for the delayed messages!</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:22:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Carl Lumma</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17515</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17515</guid>
      <description>Your moderators were all asleep at the switch.  Sorry! -Carl</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Diaschismic and Kleismic family data</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:18:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ae_risse_lic_cion</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17513</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17513</guid>
      <description>Here is my compilation of data for diaschismic and kleismic temperaments, two of my favourite classes of all limits and my most favourite in the 5-limit. I did</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>even better than 17-WT?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:18:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>manuphonic</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17512</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17512</guid>
      <description>In his essay &quot;The 17-tone Puzzle -- And the Neo-medieval Key That Unlocks It&quot; George Secor wrote: &quot;Is 17-WT, then, the final step in this alternate history of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Generalising gcd frequency to Gaussian Integers</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 22:38:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul H</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17511</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17511</guid>
      <description>... I can&#39;t seem to get to a lot of the links at the top. (Resources). I would say try to get to Gene&#39;s stuff and Graham&#39;s stuff to start. And don&#39;t worry</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Generalising gcd frequency to Gaussian Integers</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:11:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rick_ballan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17510</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17510</guid>
      <description>... Actually Paul, there is one other problem that came up on the alternate tunings list which I can&#39;t find a math&#39;s solution for. And that is, how can the lcm</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Generalising gcd frequency to Gaussian Integers</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:08:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rick_ballan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17509</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17509</guid>
      <description>... Hi Paul, Thanks for getting back. At this stage I don&#39;t know much about complex numbers either so you&#39;re not alone there. Unlike reals, I can&#39;t &#39;picture&#39;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Generalising gcd frequency to Gaussian Integers</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:07:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul H</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17508</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17508</guid>
      <description>... Rick, This looks really interesting. I am into algebra (groups, rings), and am learning more about complex analysis. I would be fun to start discussing</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Generalising gcd frequency to Gaussian Integers</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 06:57:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rick ballan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17507</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17507</guid>
      <description>Hello everyone, My name&#39;s Rick and I&#39;m a new member. Forgive me for starting a new thread but I haven&#39;t got my &#39;daily digest&#39; yet and couldn&#39;t find an answer</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mathematics and Music - John Fauvel</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 19:01:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul H</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17506</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17506</guid>
      <description>... A better way to state this would be to say: A Z-related difference set (pair, or triple, or whatever) operated upon by the affine group action will produce</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stephen Wolfram&#39;s &quot;alpha&quot; is online</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 17:19:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Andreas Sparschuh</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17505</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17505</guid>
      <description>Hi all, try it out and improve the site: http://www40.wolframalpha.com/examples/Music.html bye A.S.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mathematics and Music - John Fauvel</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:33:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul H</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17504</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/17504</guid>
      <description>Difference Set: Sorry, when all Differences are the Same. The other case, such as the Diatonic Collection &lt;1,4,3,2,5,0&gt; is another matter.</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Fri Nov 20 17:57:00 PST 2009 -->
