<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>tuning at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/</link>
    <description>Welcome to the Alternate Tunings Mailing List.</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: 75/64 (was: A new diminished seventh chord)</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:35:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Marcel de Velde</dc:creator>
      <link>http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85273</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85273</guid>
      <description>Hi Billy, Going by the JI scale alone, I find that the choice between 16/9 and 9/5 for ... Sorry but I&#39;m still studying normal harmonic theory. I never went to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 75/64 (was: A new diminished seventh chord)</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:43:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>duckfeetbilly</dc:creator>
      <link>http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85272</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85272</guid>
      <description>... Going by the JI scale alone, I find that the choice between 16/9 and 9/5 for the 7th depends on what note in the scale the chord is rooted on, since some</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>75/64 (was: A new diminished seventh chord)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:59:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jacques Dudon</dc:creator>
      <link>http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85271</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85271</guid>
      <description>13:16:20 (without 11)  share many recurrent series , such as Iph (= 2/ Phi) : 55:68:84:104:128:160 (but 11 will make friends with 55, if not with 89 !) Now</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 75/64 (was: A new diminished seventh chord)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:58:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jacques Dudon</dc:creator>
      <link>http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85270</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85270</guid>
      <description>Dear Ozan, I am totally convinced of the complementarity of higher and lower primes, just like God is, who did not create high primes for nothing ! ; ) You</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7/6 instead of: Re: 75/64 (was: A new diminished seventh chord) </title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:13:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Marcel de Velde</dc:creator>
      <link>http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85269</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85269</guid>
      <description>Hi Oz, Have you tried the chord ... Well I&#39;d prefer 1/1 5/4 3/2 5/2 by far :) 550/441 sounds like an out of tune 5/4 to me in the chord you just gave. But if I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 75/64 (was: A new diminished seventh chord)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:12:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Marcel de Velde</dc:creator>
      <link>http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85268</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85268</guid>
      <description>Hi Mike, Marcel: your theory includes lots of extremely dissonant chords with ... I&#39;m not prioritizing melodic consonance over harmonic consonance. I am</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7/6 instead of: Re: 75/64 (was: A new diminished seventh  chord)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:22:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ozan Yarman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85267</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85267</guid>
      <description>Have you tried the chord 882:1100:1323:2205 In Yarman-36c? The ratios are: 1/1 550/441 3/2 5/2 Tell me if what you hear is consonant or not. Now compare it</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7/6 instead of: Re: 75/64 (was: A new diminished seventh  chord)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:07:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ozan Yarman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85266</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85266</guid>
      <description>✩ ✩ ✩ www.ozanyarman.com ... Modulating to other keys or transposing to different ahenks (diapasons). ... Yes. We are looking for something in between. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 75/64 (was: A new diminished seventh chord)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:49:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mike Battaglia</dc:creator>
      <link>http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85265</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85265</guid>
      <description>Marcel: your theory includes lots of extremely dissonant chords with comma-adjusted intervals, correct? Why do you not make use instead of comma-adjusted</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 75/64 (was: A new diminished seventh chord)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:23:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Marcel de Velde</dc:creator>
      <link>http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85264</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85264</guid>
      <description>Hi Joe, ... Very nice piece :) If I understand correctly you use the 75/64 in a minor triad aswell as 1/1 75/64 3/2? I like that minor triad too, as 8/5 15/8</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7/6 instead of: Re: 75/64 (was: A new diminished seventh chord) </title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:23:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Marcel de Velde</dc:creator>
      <link>http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85263</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85263</guid>
      <description>Hi Oz, O Marcel, ... Well if you&#39;re looking to use all fifths as pure fifths (and fourths as pure fourths) in your scale then you must be modulating. If you&#39;re</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7/6 instead of: Re: 75/64 (was: A new diminished seventh  chord)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:28:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ozan Yarman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85262</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85262</guid>
      <description>O Marcel, 16/9 should be in place of 9/5, because we want a &quot;4:3&quot; between that and 4/3. Your scale seems rigid enough, except: 1. There is an ugly 56:75 (506</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7/6 instead of: Re: 75/64 (was: A new diminished seventh chord) </title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:30:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Marcel de Velde</dc:creator>
      <link>http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85261</guid>
      <description>Hi Oz, These are some very high ratios. How do you come by these? By ear? Umm, I am not exactly concerned with the overtone series after 5/4 ... I wouldn&#39;t</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7/6 instead of:  Re: 75/64 (was: A new diminished seventh chord)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:54:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ozan Yarman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85260</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85260</guid>
      <description>Umm, I am not exactly concerned with the overtone series after 5/4 failed to be the correct equivalent of perde segah under many circumstances. Just as I find</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fwd: [tuning] Re:75/64 (was: A new diminished seventh chord)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:15:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ozan Yarman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85259</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/85259</guid>
      <description>A strange consonant quasi minor-major seventh chord arises from the scale given below. 11:13:16:20 This doesn&#39;t exist in the SCALA chords archive. Any</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Thu Dec 17 00:42:40 PST 2009 -->
