<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>visualcadd at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/</link>
    <description>The Visual CADD Group</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: OT:  Windows 7 and GD</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:50:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dave_mucha</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24817</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24817</guid>
      <description>Since I still have to keep GC around for much of it&#39;s functionality, I am wondering if anyone tried the Generic Cadd in Win 7 ? Dave</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Symbols</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:23:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24816</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24816</guid>
      <description>Thanks. I found: http://cben.net/ Which had what I had used before and they had what I needed.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Symbols</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:14:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Toth</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24815</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24815</guid>
      <description>Here is a link that might help http://www.caddprimer.com/CAD_Symbols_symbol_library/CAD_symbol_symbols_library.htm ... [Non-text portions of this message have</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Digest Number 2800</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:28:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Francois vanderSpuy</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24814</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24814</guid>
      <description>I just bought a laptop with Windows 7 and upgraded to Windows 7 Proffesional right off the bat with the understanding it can run in XP mode to allow older</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OT:  Windows 7</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:07:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James Kintz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24813</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24813</guid>
      <description>Absolutely no issues wrt VCADD, 32 or 64 bit. I&#39;ve run VCADD on both. As far as Win7 otherwise, there are a couple of install things to look out for. If you</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OT:  Windows 7</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:47:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jim Rohbock</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24812</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24812</guid>
      <description>Ditto – I’m using Windows 7 and Vcadd on my laptop and no problems. From: visualcadd@yahoogroups.com [mailto:visualcadd@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jim</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OT:  Windows 7</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:43:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jim Peterson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24811</guid>
      <description>VCadd works the same in Windows 7 as it does is Vista (32 &amp; 64 bit versions). Windows 7 is just a MUCH better Vista. ... From: Gregory M. Richard</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OT:  Windows 7</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:31:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James Golden</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24810</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24810</guid>
      <description>If it didn&#39;t work in Vista (I never tried it).  It won&#39;t work in Windows 7.  Win 7 is more usability improvements and little under the hood fixes. However they</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OT:  Windows 7</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:23:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gregory M. Richard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24809</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24809</guid>
      <description>Anyone have any feedback about Windows 7, especially as it relates to VCADD? -- Best Regards, *Gregory M. Richard**, ICA &amp; CA, CNU** *Remington Architecture </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Symbols</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:05:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24808</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24808</guid>
      <description>Some time ago I had a bunch of symbols for metal working machines. Apparently in one of my cleaning moods I deleted them.  I am looking for tool room machinery</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FW: [VC] FW:  Re:Just curious... how many of us are there</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:20:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ge Cagle Mail</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24807</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24807</guid>
      <description>... isn&#39;t happening with VCADD now?  Was it just a good timing (GC was an old dog before there were 1,000 CAD software to choose from?) or was there a </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Just curious... how many of us are there</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:33:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Marc Paxton</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24806</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24806</guid>
      <description>&lt;second try - reply is to group&gt; OK, that explains my relative high degree of cynicism or sarcasm or both (I am 56 and feeling it these days). Did you notice</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FW:  Re:Just curious... how many of us are there</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:21:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Hal Roenick</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24805</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24805</guid>
      <description>Paul, I probably should be kept away from your symbols...I would end up building a hermaphrodite with 2 left legs and 1 arm with an unshaven pit. The </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FW:  Re:Just curious... how many of us are there</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:55:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Depoister, Paul</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24804</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24804</guid>
      <description>Hal, We don&#39;t do chalk outlines but I do have a whole directory full of body part symbols!  We&#39;ve got arms, legs, heads, and torsos for males, females,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FW: [VC] FW:  Re:Just curious... how many of us are there</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:15:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Harrell Staton</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24803</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/visualcadd/message/24803</guid>
      <description>This is the first time I have chimed in in quite a while. The original attraction to me for GC was the fact that when it was first introduced, it was marketed</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Dec  2 05:09:40 PST 2009 -->
