<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>vsx-dis at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/</link>
    <description>VSX Discussion</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: UCAC3 identifier format... It&#39;s a joke...</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:13:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Christopher Watson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/500</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/500</guid>
      <description>There was a boat-load of things in UCAC3 that should have been worked out before a public release -- of those, nomenclature being the most trivial by far! </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UCAC3 identifier format... It&#39;s a joke...</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:48:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sebastián Otero</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/499</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/499</guid>
      <description>Subject: Re: [vsx-dis] UCAC3 identifier format. ... </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UCAC3 identifier format.</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:06:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Christopher Watson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/498</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/498</guid>
      <description>http://cdsweb.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/Dic-Simbad?/10531273 The Dictionary of Nomeclature is supposed to be the up-to-date electronic repository of the acronyms</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UCAC3 identifier format.</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:39:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sebastián Otero</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/497</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/497</guid>
      <description>Brian, ... Well, the acronym seems to be 3UCAC. The format seems to be different though, but I would follow what&#39;s stated in the SIMBAD dictionary of </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UCAC3 identifier format.</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:30:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang Renz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/496</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/496</guid>
      <description>Hello Bill J Gray of projectpluto.com writes at: http://www.projectpluto.com/new.htm ... UCAC-3 numbering modified: UCAC-3 has rapidly passed from its original</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UCAC3 identifier format.</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:51:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Brian D. Warner</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/495</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/495</guid>
      <description>Sebastian, ... Just to tell submitters that the official format for the recently released UCAC3 catalog (see http://cdsweb.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/Dic-Simbad) is:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UCAC3 identifier format.</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:13:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sebastián Otero</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/494</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/494</guid>
      <description>Just to tell submitters that the official format for the recently released UCAC3 catalog (see http://cdsweb.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/Dic-Simbad) is: 3UCAC</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Debate on VSX - continued</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:58:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>martin_piers_nicholson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/493</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/493</guid>
      <description>Debate on VSX - continued The debate is starting to draw to a close now. Some very forthright views have been expressed and some fundamental misunderstandings</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Debate on VSX</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:21:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>martin_piers_nicholson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/491</guid>
      <description>There is an interesting debate on VSX underway at: http://simostronomy.blogspot.com/2008/07/international-variable-star- index-vsx.html While readers might not</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggestions for VSX</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:07:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Christopher Watson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/490</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/490</guid>
      <description>I believe Paul has AstroPlanner catalogs for the GCVS and NSV (plus supplement), so a good amount of bona-fide and suspected variables for use in the program</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggestions for VSX</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:10:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Michael Kran</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/489</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/489</guid>
      <description>Hello Christopher, Thank you for your reply. I have AstroPlanner, but I had not thought of it in terms of variable stars, even a sub-set of VSX. That would be</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggestions for VSX</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 07:24:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Christopher Watson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/488</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/488</guid>
      <description>No, Michael...VSX does not have that feature.  Sounds like a good idea, at first blush, although I don&#39;t think we ever envisioned VSX as being an observation</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggestions for VSX</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 06:53:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>michael.kran</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/487</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/487</guid>
      <description>For what its worth, I joined vsx-dis just as I was thinking that a query based on the observer&#39;s location, a filter on the altitude of the object, and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Publish them in JAAVSO yourself</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:45:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>martin_piers_nicholson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/485</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/485</guid>
      <description>... VSX they should therefore have sufficient data and be suitable enough for you to submit them in a paper to JAAVSO yourself.  If you are a fee paying member</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Publish them in JAAVSO yourself</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:56:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>interferom</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/484</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vsx-dis/message/484</guid>
      <description>As your VSX variables have passed moderation and been included into VSX they should therefore have sufficient data and be suitable enough for you to submit</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Tue Jan  5 19:34:48 PST 2010 -->
