waldorf-critics at Yahoo! Groups

the case for over parenting

MarkT — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:41:16 GMT

a fascinating article in the nov 30th issue of time. basically it sounds like a call to common sense, get your kids outside, throw away their loud toys etc

Re: Teapot

winters_diana — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:39:58 GMT

... I don't think he's putting him in an undiscussable category per se; it's more that *some people* can discuss him and some people can't, based on criteria

Re: Teapot

winters_diana — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:32:37 GMT

... So this is your epistemology? You came out of this process knowing "nada"? Do you think your epistemology squares with Steiner's epistemology? Do you think

Re: Teapot

Peter Staudenmaier — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:07:20 GMT

Hi Dennis, ... Yes, of course. That's what I've been saying all along. So have several other people. Skepticism is a very useful tool for all arguments. When

Re: the epistemology of credulousness

Peter Staudenmaier — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:06:05 GMT

Hi Alicia, ... Yes, that seems likely to me. One of the formulations that Dennis took exception to was about Steiner allowing his followers to draw inferences

Re: the epistemology of credulousness

Peter Staudenmaier — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:04:24 GMT

Hi Diana, thanks for several thoughtful posts. I think you are very much right about the ways in which an emerging guru's original intentions can become

Fwd: It doesn't matter what Dan knows or doesn't know.

alicia h. — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:18:49 GMT

I am sick and tired of this. There's no way in hell I take my time to translate his emails. If he doesn't like what google translate does with them, it's not

SP

Dennis — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:02:07 GMT

I'm thinking not everyone gets the meaning of "special pleading." Dennis, it doesn't have to mean someone's overtly "pleading" for someone or something, it

Re: Teapot

Dennis — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:25:23 GMT

... Hi Peter: Should I take a skeptical view to what you've written? When I was very young I became terribly interested in an American historical personality

Re: Andreas Lichte's Challenge to Dan as WC owner

alicia h. — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:44:10 GMT

In the meantime, there was yet another one. "Off topic/on topic" "Frau H., war's das schon? (siehe unten) Na, da geht doch noch mehr, oder? "off topic/on

Re: Andreas Lichte's Challenge to Dan as WC owner

alicia h. — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:17 GMT

2009/11/23 winters_diana ... It definitely is. It may seem exotic and strange, but it truly is -- apart from being sort of a

Re: Andreas Lichte's Challenge to Dan as WC owner

alicia h. — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:02:17 GMT

2009/11/23 tmasthenes13 ... [my emphasis] Hey, aren't you supposed to be the "Special Occult Double Agent Provocateur for the Asuric

Re: Andreas Lichte's Challenge to Dan as WC owner

winters_diana — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:06:56 GMT

Dan, Although I understand wanting to discourage a lot of time spent gnawing on this, I definitely understand Alicia wanting to document it here. And I also

Re: Andreas Lichte's Challenge to Dan as WC owner

tmasthenes13 — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:52:29 GMT

... Dan, I'm curious why you include Andreas on your list. Everyone else you mention is a subscriber to WC, and therefore subject to the rules you have set for

Re: Andreas Lichte's Challenge to Dan as WC owner

alicia h. — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:17:32 GMT

I am suggesting this *has* to be taken seriously. I have recieved yet another email. Had this person been an anthroposophist, things would have been different,