wdf-dom at Yahoo! Groups

Re: about document.image1

Paul Wilkins — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:15:41 GMT

... Netscape create the DOM Level 0 standard, which has been around for as long as JavaScript. See http://www.quirksmode.org/js/dom0.html -- Paul Wilkins

Re: about document.image1

ray — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:14:27 GMT

Is this the standard way? ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: about document.image1

ray — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:53:08 GMT

Good trick. Thanks ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: about document.image1

ray — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:43:07 GMT

It seems it also works on Firefox on Linux, as I tested. ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: about document.image1

Chad Oakenfold — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 20:42:30 GMT

There is a document.images object that has all the images on a web page. You can access images using array notation like: document.images [1], maybe the

Re: about document.image1

Casey — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 20:41:08 GMT

... var gbn = document.getElementsByName; var image = gbn('image1'); There's your shortened code. - Casey

Re: about document.image1

diego nunes — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:07:00 GMT

... It's a completely non-standard way of doing things, and is a bad idea because it's implementation-dependent. You can't complain if some new browser build

Re: about document.image1

Ian Petersen — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:56:19 GMT

... Oh, that's surprising. Good to know, I guess. Ian

Re: about document.image1

Lon Boonen — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:00:55 GMT

... It might be non-standard, but it works in all browsers I just tested: Opera, Safari, Chrome, IE, Firefox. All on Windows BTW.

Re: about document.image1

Ian Petersen — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:22:35 GMT

... Nope. As far as I know, that is a "feature" of Internet Explorer. It's very non-standard and generally a bad idea. Ian

about document.image1

ray — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:18:24 GMT

Hi, all I found I can get the img element named with "image1" in a html by using "document.image1" with javascript. It's very convenient because I don't need

Re: I am confused with result of hasChildNotes() method of DOM

Jonathan Hurshman — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:49:47 GMT

All the responses so far are correct: it's because your markup is invalid. To explain why this causes the symptoms you're seeing, you need to understand that

Re: I am confused with result of hasChildNotes() method of DOM

Mone — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:53:06 GMT

You can use the IE Developer toolbar to see how IE goes mad rendering a inside a On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Hassan Schroeder

Re: I am confused with result of hasChildNotes() method of DOM

Hassan Schroeder — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:19:26 GMT

... Garbage in, garbage out -- a TD can't have a TR as a child. Using invalid markup causes all kinds of interesting problems. :-) -- Hassan Schroeder

Re: I am confused with result of hasChildNotes() method of DOM

Christopher Torgalson — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:11:24 GMT

Hi, ... It's because your markup is invalid. A can NOT be the immediate child of a . Usually it will be the immediate child of a , but might be