winpoker at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Installing Winpoker under Microsoft Vista

Tim Narikawa — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:55:30 GMT

I'm having the same problem. I don't have spybot and I disabled all virus programs. Any suggestions? From: winpoker@yahoogroups.com

Re: winpoker on cellular (long )

Mark Marsh — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 03:38:58 GMT

It's working very well! Mark

Re: winpoker on cellular (long )

Dean Zamzow — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:24:55 GMT

Noah, To my knowledge, the current version of Pocket Winpoker does work on the Treo 700w. I had one beta tester that confirmed it did work on the square

Re: winpoker on cellular (long )

sallynoah — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:55:18 GMT

I have been running Pocket Winpoker on a HP 1910 PDA but am having trouble with thed PDA and expect to replace it with a smartphone. Did you ever modify the

Re: volatility calculator

mroejacks — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 03:57:30 GMT

... one game ... but it ... swing, ... payouts for 5 ... but how ... Variance is the most common method of approximating volatility. However, it has it's own

Re: volatility calculator

dchealer — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:09:19 GMT

Hi Roger, this site has a ton of info. on VP and I think it will address your question about volatility. The proverbial challenge with VP is how to make your

volatility calculator

Roger Easson — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:34:25 GMT

Does anyone know of a site wher you can compare the volatility of one game to another? For instance NSUD has an ER a little above what Bonus Deuces has but it

Re: Which approach might be better?

Hon Bruce S. Trachtenberg, fJTC — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:17:45 GMT

Doe that mean that she buys dinner? ... From: Jack LaMonica To: winpoker@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 11:09 PM Subject: [winpoker] Re:

Re: Which approach might be better?

mroejacks — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:26:21 GMT

... been playing at Station properties however, their new program of cash back will cost me over $300.00 a month in benefits. The casino host contend that

Re: Which approach might be better?

Jack LaMonica — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:09:59 GMT

5-play nickel usually is less volatile for my wife than my single line quarter game. She rarely loses on all 5 hands, but I lose my $1.25 on single line quite

Re: Which approach might be better?

Hon Bruce S. Trachtenberg, fJTC — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:37:06 GMT

Thanks for the clarification. Theoretically you each have the same anticipated return. The odds for any given hand remain the same no matter what

Re: Which approach might be better?

Cielaszyk — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:01:18 GMT

Check the vpFREE database: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/LV.htm Dennis vp-connoisseur ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Which approach might be better?

saltyfrogs@... — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:33:25 GMT

I need some help for local players in the Las Vegas area. I have been playing at Station properties however, their new program of cash back will cost me over

Re: Which approach might be better?

poochiek@... — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:41:07 GMT

I am confused! ... From: Harry Porter To: winpoker@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 3:21 am Subject: [winpoker] Re: Which

Re: Which approach might be better?

Harry Porter — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:21:42 GMT

... To put this in another perspective, where you're talking 5-play nickels vs single play quarters, and assuming the same number of deals in either case, the