<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>xosl at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/</link>
    <description>General discussion list for Extended Operating System Loader (XOSL).</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: XOSL with Vista - the &quot;Disk Signature&quot; problem</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:41:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sezor</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5120</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5120</guid>
      <description>That sounds to me as if it will work (though I have no experience of Vista). Keep us informed if it works. Sezor</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OT:  sata &amp; Ranish PM</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:41:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sezor</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5119</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5119</guid>
      <description>This is off topic but only brief. Two of the early motherboards to have sata which I tried weren&#39;t very handy. With modern mobos, is there any problem using</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XOSL with Vista - the &quot;Disk Signature&quot; problem</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:40:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>sol_403</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5118</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5118</guid>
      <description>Well, I took the plunge and tried it out and everything worked. According to my previous link, Vista does require the Disk Signature to remain unchanged, and I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XOSL with Vista - the &quot;Disk Signature&quot; problem</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:48:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>man_o_media</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5117</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5117</guid>
      <description>Well I have to say, I didn&#39;t look at the links but I don&#39;t know what you are talking about with the signature and Vista... I have been using XOSL for years on</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XOSL with Vista - the &quot;Disk Signature&quot; problem</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:42:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>sol_403</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5116</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5116</guid>
      <description>I like XOSL and I want to use it with Vista. Web searches show that others have sucessfully done this, but there is an &quot;issue&quot; with the Disk Signature. Here is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XOSL doesn&#39;t boot</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:14:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>philvergnes</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5115</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5115</guid>
      <description>... So it doesn&#39;t come from the video card. But where is installed your XOSL? It happen to me when I moved the partition with the XOSL installation. ...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XOSL doesn&#39;t boot</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:11:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>allar.saks</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5114</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5114</guid>
      <description>I have Geforce 4 MX video card.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XOSL doesn&#39;t boot</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:25:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Antoine W. Campagna</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5113</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5113</guid>
      <description>... Well that is strange, it seems XOSL is not capable of setting a correct graphic mode of the video chip. It is usually quite good at doing that (much better</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XOSL doesn&#39;t boot</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:58:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>allar.saks</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5112</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5112</guid>
      <description>I install the XOSL but when I reboot my computer it says Extended Operating System Loader 1.1.5 ant that&#39;s all :( Like, in the black screen. It doesn&#39;t load</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Windows Home Server</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:36:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robyn</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5111</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5111</guid>
      <description>Hello Melinda, XOSL is not O/S dependant. I would strongly recommend that you install XOSL 1st in a small partition at the beginning of the drive, then hide</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Windows Home Server</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:12:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Melinda Parker</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5110</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5110</guid>
      <description>I am asking XOSL will this work with Windows Home Server?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XOSL is only letting me use 3 logical partitions</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:59:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Antoine W. Campagna</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5109</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5109</guid>
      <description>... XOSL may not recognize every file system, which file system is used on the Linux partition you do not see ? We have received some reports of XOSL not being</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XOSL is only letting me use 3 logical partitions</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:06:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ernest</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5108</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5108</guid>
      <description>Hello members, I have a problem with my XOSL installation. At present it is only letting me see three logical partions. I have no problem seeing my three</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: never try WINXP boot , NEVER!</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:26:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robyn</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5107</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5107</guid>
      <description>Hi Thomas, ... The limit of four primary (including extended) partitions is per disk. It is not a limitation of XOSL, it is in the standard ms-dos disklabel,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: never try WINXP boot , NEVER!</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:25:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>junja</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5106</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/xosl/message/5106</guid>
      <description>Interesting Norman. I suggest the bios is crucial (in principle, they&#39;re improving all the time).  What is yours? Junja</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Jul  6 06:28:28 PDT 2009 -->
